The company pays the group health insurance premium, but it is the employees who use the services – which is why premium payment at some point also becomes an HR matter. If the company falls behind with the transfer in a difficult quarter, the employee knows nothing about it: they call the service organiser just as before and go to the specialist just as before. The policy conditions and the Hungarian Civil Code (Ptk.), however, lay down a precise timetable for late payment, and it ends not in suspension but in the retroactive termination of the contract. In this article we go through what happens week by week after a premium is missed, where the employees' cover stands in the meantime, who bears the cost of care used in the interim, and what the company – as policyholder – has to do towards the insured persons.
- Under Section 6:449 of the Hungarian Civil Code (Ptk.), the insurer sends a written reminder about the premium arrears, warning of the consequences and setting a thirty-day grace period counted from the date the reminder is sent; if this period expires without payment, the contract terminates retroactively to the due date of the unpaid premium.
- The retroactive effect is the key point: care used during the reminder period may retrospectively become uncovered, and the cost – depending on the policy conditions and the insurer's practice – may end up with the company or with the employee.
- The policyholder is obliged to inform the insured persons about the insurer's statements and about changes to the contract – including its termination; this is a task for HR and the managing director, which neither the insurer nor the broker carries out on the company's behalf.
The timetable: due date, reminder, grace period, termination
The starting point is Section 6:449 of the Ptk. If the premium due is not paid, the insurer – warning of the consequences – sends the policyholder a written reminder and sets a thirty-day grace period for payment, counted from the date the reminder is sent. If the grace period expires without payment, the contract terminates with retroactive effect to the due date, unless the insurer enforces its premium claim in court without delay. Group health insurance conditions adopt this rule: Alfa's group health insurance conditions (CSEB-SZ-250501, point 7.4) provide for a 30-day grace period and state that the contract terminates “with retroactive effect to the due date of the first unpaid premium”. Other insurers' conditions may differ in the details – which is why it is worth knowing the premium payment clause of your own policy.
Two practical details determine how much time there actually is. One is the payment frequency: with a monthly premium, the reference point is the due date of the first unpaid month; with a quarterly or annual premium, it is a larger amount and an earlier date. The other is who the reminder is addressed to: the insurer sends the letter to the policyholder, to the address or contact person given in the contract. If the finance contact has left in the meantime and the company has not reported the change, the reminder may go astray – yet under the conditions the deadline runs from the date it was sent, not from when someone read it. An overdue monthly premium invoice is not in itself a reminder; the reminder is the separate document warning of the legal consequences, and that is the one to take seriously.
What happens to care used in the meantime?
This is the particular trap of a group contract. Termination is retroactive: if the company did not pay the March premium, the reminder went out in April and the grace period expired in May, the contract terminates as of the March due date. In the meantime, however, employees used the package in March, April and May as well – from the insurer's point of view, this care retrospectively falls outside the period of cover, so it does not count as insured events. The insurer pays only for what is an insured event under your contract – and under a terminated contract, nothing is.
Who ultimately bears the cost is typically not settled item by item in the conditions – we found no express rule on this in the Alfa conditions we reviewed either – so it comes down to the practice of the insurer and the service organiser, which differs from insurer to insurer. In the service-financing (network) model, the service organiser settles the bill for the care with the clinic; if cover falls away retrospectively, the insurer may claim the amount paid out without legal basis from the policyholder, i.e. the company, or the bill for care already arranged but not yet settled may end up with the patient, the employee. In the reimbursement model, the employee has paid up front in any case, and the insurer rejects invoices submitted for the terminated period – the difference between the two models is the subject of a separate article of ours. If the benefit is set out in the employment contract or in the benefits policy, the employee may claim the cost left with them from the company; this is then an employment-law question on which the opinion of an employment lawyer is warranted.
Who must be notified – and who does it?
In a group contract, the insurer deals with the policyholder, not with the insured persons. That is why the conditions place the duty to inform on the policyholder: under point 2.2 of the Alfa conditions, the policyholder is obliged to inform the insured person about statements addressed to it by the insurer and about changes to the contract, and the Doktor Plusz clause (CSOP-ASZF-Z-250601-PS, point 3) states that it is the policyholder who notifies the insured person of the termination of the contract. The same principle appears in the insurance chapter of the Ptk.: if the contract is not concluded by the insured person, the contracting party informs the insured person about the statements addressed to it and about changes to the contract. The reminder letter is therefore not just a matter for finance: HR and management need to know about it, because failing to inform is their responsibility. Neither the insurer nor the broker takes this obligation over from the company; only the company knows the names and contact details of the insured colleagues.
What should you write to employees? Briefly and factually: from when there is no cover, what to do about appointments already booked, and whom to contact with questions. If the company settles the premium within the grace period, in practice the message can be a short reassuring note (under the conditions, the insured persons must be informed of the insurer's statements, including the reminder); if not, everyone must be notified of the termination in writing, in a verifiable way, including those on sick pay or on leave. The policyholder's other obligations – declarations, records, data processing – are summarised in our article on employer obligations.
Reinstatement or a new contract?
Section 6:449 of the Ptk. offers a second chance: if the contract terminated because a subsequent premium was not paid, the policyholder may, within 120 days of the date of termination, ask the insurer in writing to reinstate cover, and the insurer may reinstate cover under the terms of the terminated contract, provided the unpaid premium is paid. The key word is “may”: this is an option for the insurer, not an obligation. Group health insurance conditions are often silent on this – we found no reactivation rule in the Alfa conditions – so the decision rests on the insurer's business judgement.
If reinstatement does not happen, a new contract has to be concluded, and a new contract starts a new clock: under the conditions, the waiting period typically starts again (point 5.3 of the Alfa conditions sets 1 month for all services), illnesses existing before the start of cover (pre-existing conditions) are assessed again, and the enrolment paperwork starts over. Colleagues with chronic illnesses end up worse off than before the late payment – our articles on waiting periods and exclusions and on how pre-existing conditions are handled explain what this means in practice. Continuity is therefore a value in itself, and one that is easy to lose through a single missed transfer.
If a liquidity problem is looming: what can the company do in advance?
Most late payments are not a decision but the result of an oversight or a temporary cash shortage – and for both there is a better scenario than termination. First: it is worth adding the payment frequency and due dates shown on the policy to the finance team's payment calendar, and keeping the addressee of reminder letters up to date. Second: if the company sees that it cannot meet a due date, it is worth contacting the insurer in advance, in writing, about deferring the premium, paying in instalments or changing the payment frequency – these depend on the conditions and on the insurer's decision and are not an automatic entitlement (point 7.4 of the Alfa conditions, for example, expressly mentions that if the parties agree on a deferral, the contract does not terminate) – but a request made in good time has better chances than an expired reminder. Third: if the benefit cannot be sustained in the long term, cancelling properly in line with the contract's rules is a better route than letting it terminate – that way employees can be notified in time and no premium arrears build up. Fourth: reducing the number of insured employees or the package level can also be an option, but its tax and employment-law aspects need to be thought through from the perspective of the benefits policy.
As brokers, we can help the company understand the premium payment, termination and reinstatement provisions of the conditions – if you get in touch, we help where we can. Paying the premium, cancelling the contract and informing employees, however, remain the company's non-transferable obligations.
In summary: by the time the reminder letter arrives, less than a month is left – the thirty days run from the date the reminder is sent – but what is at stake is not only the insurance but also the fate of care used in the meantime and your colleagues' trust. Check the premium payment clause of the policy, connect finance with HR, and if the situation does end in termination, inform the insured persons in writing.
A question tailored to your company's contract and premium payment situation? Book a free 20-minute consultation →
Sources
- Hungarian Civil Code (Ptk., Act V of 2013) Section 6:449 – consequences of failing to pay the premium, reinstatement of cover
- Alfa Vienna Insurance Group – Doktor Plusz group health insurance conditions (CSEB-SZ-250501: points 2.2, 5.3, 7.4, 7.6; CSOP-ASZF-Z-250601-PS clause, point 3)
