Beyond the PIT-side advantage (33.04%), there is a second, less discussed tax benefit: the premium can be a recognised cost for corporate income tax. Here is when.
The main rule
Under the CIT Act, personal insurance premiums are costs incurred in the interest of the business – hence recognised – if the insured is – among others – an employee of the payer, an executive officer or a personally contributing member [CIT Act, Annex 3, B) 8.]. In practice: premiums paid for employees, managing directors and personally contributing partners reduce the tax base.
The family-member question
Family members can join the group contract; the CIT treatment of their premium share depends on how it is accounted for – booked as a taxable benefit, as a personal-nature other payment, it can typically be a recognised cost. The more common, cleaner solution is that the employee reimburses the family premium share, e.g. via payroll deduction – in that case no CIT question arises at all. It is worth finalising the specific accounting treatment with your accountant.
Pensioners, contractors, agency staff?
Borderline cases – employed pensioners, contractor relationships, agency workers – need individual assessment, because favourable treatment depends on the type of legal relationship. With such populations it is worth clarifying this during contract structuring, so neither the PIT nor the CIT side brings surprises.
Documentation
Recognition requires an orderly background: the group contract, an objective definition of the insured population, and premium payment records. The same documents protect the company against PIT-side reclassification – both taxes stand or fall on the same contract quality.
Informational content, not tax advice – align specifics with your accountant. Related: the full tax picture and the specific defined benefit.
A question about your own team? Book a free 20-minute consultation →
